Two Motley Fool growth services. Two clocks.
Stock Advisor runs on a GARP clock — quality at a price you can live with, held until the cash flows show up in the multiple. It is the older book. It owns the Nvidia lot: recommended in 2005, still on the card, +138,096% on the original ticket. That is what a 20-year clock looks like when you do not stop it.
Rule Breakers runs on a disruptor clock. The first year is supposed to hurt (46.2% win, −4.3% average). The 1–3 year window is where this book often matches or beats Stock Advisor on the same-aged cohort (+44.8% average vs SA’s +18.2%). The decade is where it becomes a religion: 98.6% winners, Tesla at +16,224%.
Both hunt growth. Both come from the same house. Both have beaten the index. They do not keep time the same way.
Stock Advisor wins for most investors. Official +981% vs S&P +216%, 286 actives, 523 positions, 66% win, 49 ten-baggers, 173 doublers, 92.9% at 10+ years, $99 standalone, 30-day refund. Rule Breakers is +318% vs +187%, 219 positions, 75% win, 37 ten-baggers, 98.6% at 10+ years — and it is not for sale by itself. You buy Epic at $299 and you get SA anyway.
This year’s exam is not “is growth back?” It is “which clock survives a software wipeout.” Hardware is the boom (SanDisk +591%, Micron +240%). Software is the wipeout (Intuit −48%, Trade Desk −63%). Rule Breakers lives in the half of tech that just sat for the exam. Stock Advisor’s GARP process is how you sit in the other half without pretending they are the same trade.
Start with Motley Fool Stock Advisor — 30-Day Money-Back Guarantee
Here’s exactly why, and when the disruptor clock is the one you should be keeping.
Quick Comparison: Motley Fool Stock Advisor vs Rule Breakers
| Dimension | Stock Advisor | Rule Breakers | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Track Record | +981% since 2002 | +318% since 2004 | Stock Advisor |
| vs S&P 500 | +216% (4.5x) | +187% (1.7x) | Stock Advisor |
| Price | $99/year (promo) | $299/year (Epic bundle) | Stock Advisor |
| Standalone Option | ✅ Yes | ❌ No (bundle only) | Stock Advisor |
| Volatility | 30-50% drawdowns | 50%+ drawdowns | Stock Advisor |
| Methodology | Balanced growth framework | Aggressive disruption hunting | Tie |
| 10-Bagger Potential | Strong compounders | Asymmetric moonshots | Rule Breakers |
| Picks Per Month | 2 | 2 (5 total in Epic) | Tie |
| Target Portfolio | $25,000+ | $50,000+ | Stock Advisor |
| Overall Winner | — | — | Stock Advisor |
The table is not close on proof, price, or access. Rule Breakers is not trying to win that table. It is trying to own the names that look reckless on a GARP spreadsheet and inevitable on a 10-year one.
Motley Fool Stock Advisor: The 24-Year Foundation
Stock Advisor is the flagship — February 2002, the book that made the Fool’s reputation. Official +981% versus the S&P’s +216%. That is 4.5x the index over a generation, not a cycle.

Motley Fool Stock Advisor Performance
The Motley Fool · 523 picks · 25 years · Updated Aug 14, 2026
| SA Return | S&P 500 | Alpha | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| +981% | +216% | +764% | 66% |
S&P 500 shows what you'd have earned buying the index on each pick date instead. Same timing, fair comparison.
| SA Multi-Baggers | 10x+ | 5x+ | 3x+ | 2x+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Count | 49 | 90 | 127 | 193 |
| SA Asymmetry | Avg Winner | Avg Loser | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Return | +1.7K% | -45% | ~38:1 |
Best Performers (All-Time)
| SA Pick | Return |
|---|---|
![]() BKNG Booking Holdings | +23K% |
![]() NFLX Netflix | +42K% |
![]() TSLA Tesla | +16K% |
![]() AAPL Apple | +6.2K% |
![]() AMZN Amazon | +34K% |
![]() NVDA NVIDIA | +138K% |
![]() CTAS CTAS | +4.5K% |
![]() MME.DL MME.DL | +4.3K% |
![]() DIS Disney | +6.0K% |
![]() SHOP Shopify | +4.7K% |
The multi-bagger pipeline. 193 doublers → 90 5-baggers → 49 10-baggers. About 25% of doublers become 10-baggers with enough time.
See All Stock Advisor Recommendations →Latest Stock Advisor Picks
Tickers masked to protect subscriber value. Recent picks need 3-5+ years to demonstrate thesis.
| SA Pick | Return |
|---|---|
**** Chip Manufacturer | +112% |
**** Cloud Monitoring | +112% |
**** Infrastructure Construction | +100% |
**** Growth Company | +77% |
**** Growth Company | +50% |
**** Growth Company | +41% |
**** Convenience Stores | +33% |
**** Growth Company | +29% |
**** E-commerce & Cloud Giant | +26% |
**** Growth Company | +20% |
Early results mislead. < 1 year: 61.1% win rate. 10+ years: 92.9%. That 32-point gap explains why judging picks early leads to selling future winners.
Stock Advisor Win Rate by Holding Period
| Hold Time | SA Win Rate | Avg Return |
|---|---|---|
| < 1 Year | 61.1% | +22% |
| 1-3 Years | 55.7% | +18% |
| 3-5 Years | 47.7% | +20% |
| 5-10 Years | 63.6% | +208% |
| 10+ Years | 92.9% | +4.1K% |
523 data points over 25 years. The pattern repeats: early volatility, mid-term clarity, long-term outperformance. The data is the strategy.
Stock Advisor Performance by Year
| Year | SA Picks | Avg Return | Win Rate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 30 | +21% | 64% | INTC+112% |
| 2025 | 26 | +14% | 52% | ASML+154% |
| 2024 | 24 | +30% | 65% | AMD+216% |
| 2023 | 26 | +89% | 70% | CRWD+602% |
| 2022 | 23 | +58% | 59% | NET+527% |
| 2021 | 22 | -12% | 27% | LRCX+551% |
| 2020 | 23 | +133% | 43% | TSLA+1.1K% |
| 2019 | 23 | +54% | 70% | SNPS+242% |
| 2018 | 19 | +223% | 68% | SHOP+1.1K% |
| 2017 | 22 | +711% | 86% | NVDA+8.7K% |
| 2016 | 20 | +446% | 85% | SHOP+4.7K% |
| 2015 | 22 | +215% | 68% | CASY+952% |
| 2014 | 20 | +353% | 80% | ATVI+2.8K% |
| 2013 | 17 | +370% | 65% | NFLX+2.4K% |
| 2012 | 23 | +1.2K% | 74% | TSLA+16K% |
| 2011 | 19 | +585% | 63% | AAPL+3.1K% |
| 2010 | 18 | +459% | 83% | AMZN+2.9K% |
| 2009 | 20 | +3.3K% | 90% | NVDA+58K% |
| 2008 | 18 | +1.2K% | 94% | AAPL+6.2K% |
| 2007 | 19 | +1.5K% | 37% | NFLX+28K% |
| 2006 | 20 | +2.4K% | 65% | NFLX+24K% |
| 2005 | 16 | +8.7K% | 63% | NVDA+138K% |
| 2004 | 17 | +5.8K% | 59% | NFLX+42K% |
| 2003 | 17 | +239% | 65% | PHIN+1.5K% |
| 2002 | 16 | +3.1K% | 81% | AMZN+34K% |
Inside Stock Advisor









9 screenshots · Click to expand
The returns are not even the most valuable part. The clock is.
What You Actually Get:
A portfolio-building framework, not a hot sheet. Cautious / Moderate / Aggressive sleeves. A Foundational Stocks list of 10 names the team will still defend at 3 a.m. Moneyball scoring across hundreds of companies. Two theses a month, written so you can still believe them after a 40% hole.
The GARP clock is simple: durable advantage, buy, wait for the market to stop being early. Nvidia in 2005 was a cyclical graphics vendor. That is what “early” looks like when the clock is allowed to run.
The Numbers:
$10,000 following the book is about $108,000. The same $10,000 in the S&P is about $31,600.
66% win overall, 92.9% at 10+ years, 49 ten-baggers, 173 doublers, 523 positions, 286 still open. Our last independent audit (Feb 18) printed +888.4% on 504 names, 65% win, 42 ten-baggers — labeled, earlier, not a second official.
The pain is not theoretical. 2021 vintage was ugly. The aggressive sleeve warns of a −59% max drawdown. Netflix, Amazon, Nvidia — every cathedral on this scorecard has a crypt. The 92.9% number is what remains after you refuse to sell the crypt.
For the complete analysis, see our Stock Advisor review.
Best For:
Patient investors, 5+ year horizon, $25K+, who want a system and can live with 30–50% holes. Two picks a month. You size them.
Not For:
Anyone who needs a 12-month trophy. Income seekers. People who will upgrade to Epic because the quiet feels like they are missing the disruptor clock.
Start with Motley Fool Stock Advisor — 30-Day Money-Back Guarantee
Rule Breakers: The Aggressive Accelerator
Rule Breakers is the growth-hunting arm. Launched 2004. Official +318% vs S&P +187%. 219 dedicated positions, 75% win, 37 ten-baggers. Average hold: 8.1 years. Tesla in 2011 is +16,224%.

Motley Fool Rule Breakers Performance
The Motley Fool · 219 picks · 22 years · Updated 2026-08-15
| RB Return | S&P 500 | Alpha | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| +318% | +187% | +131% | 75% |
S&P 500 shows what you'd have earned buying the index on each pick date instead. Same timing, fair comparison.
| RB Multi-Baggers | 10x+ | 5x+ | 3x+ | 2x+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Count | 37 | 66 | 93 | 108 |
| RB Asymmetry | Avg Winner | Avg Loser | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Return | +911% | -38% | ~24:1 |
Best Performers (All-Time)
| RB Pick | Return |
|---|---|
![]() GOOGL Alphabet (Google) | +3.1K% |
![]() MELI MercadoLibre | +13K% |
![]() SHOP Shopify | +7.2K% |
![]() MNST MNST | +3.3K% |
![]() AVGO Broadcom | +3.2K% |
![]() TSLA Tesla | +16K% |
![]() PANW Palo Alto Networks | +3.2K% |
![]() ISRG Intuitive Surgical | +7.9K% |
![]() ANET Arista Networks | +4.2K% |
![]() VRTX Vertex Pharma | +4.7K% |
The multi-bagger pipeline. 108 doublers → 66 5-baggers → 37 10-baggers. About 34% of doublers become 10-baggers with enough time.
See All Rule Breakers Recommendations →Latest Rule Breakers Picks
Tickers masked to protect subscriber value. Recent picks need 3-5+ years to demonstrate thesis.
| RB Pick | Return |
|---|---|
**** Life Sciences Software | +45% |
**** Growth Company | +23% |
**** Growth Company | +20% |
**** Growth Company | +16% |
**** Growth Company | +5% |
**** Growth Company | +4% |
**** Social Platform | -4% |
**** Growth Company | -9% |
**** RNA Therapeutics | -20% |
**** Growth Company | -31% |
Lessons from 2011. 4 picks that year averaged +4.5K%. Best performers often come from buying during uncertainty—when conviction feels hardest.
Rule Breakers Win Rate by Holding Period
| Hold Time | RB Win Rate | Avg Return |
|---|---|---|
| < 1 Year | 46.2% | -4% |
| 1-3 Years | 61.3% | +45% |
| 3-5 Years | 56.4% | +65% |
| 5-10 Years | 72.3% | +211% |
| 10+ Years | 98.6% | +1.8K% |
Time is the strategy. 10+ year picks show 98.6% win rate with +1.8K% average returns. Same methodology, same picks—time transforms the results.
Rule Breakers Performance by Year
| Year | RB Picks | Avg Return | Win Rate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 8 | +4% | 63% | VEEV+45% |
| 2025 | 12 | +2% | 42% | BBIO+99% |
| 2024 | 17 | +55% | 65% | GH+415% |
| 2023 | 19 | +72% | 63% | CRWD+657% |
| 2022 | 19 | +77% | 63% | ANET+667% |
| 2021 | 17 | +35% | 41% | CRWD+214% |
| 2020 | 13 | -14% | 38% | ISRG+102% |
| 2019 | 14 | +121% | 64% | DDOG+686% |
| 2018 | 13 | +417% | 92% | MDB+1.3K% |
| 2017 | 10 | +380% | 100% | TWLO+720% |
| 2016 | 14 | +1.4K% | 100% | SHOP+7.2K% |
| 2015 | 5 | +663% | 80% | AXON+2.5K% |
| 2014 | 11 | +1.1K% | 100% | ANET+4.2K% |
| 2013 | 8 | +463% | 100% | AX+941% |
| 2012 | 8 | +1.4K% | 100% | META+2.5K% |
| 2011 | 4 | +4.5K% | 100% | TSLA+16K% |
| 2010 | 2 | +335% | 100% | OLED+437% |
| 2009 | 7 | +3.5K% | 100% | MELI+13K% |
| 2008 | 4 | +1.6K% | 100% | ISRG+2.8K% |
| 2007 | 7 | +1.1K% | 100% | CMG+2.7K% |
| 2006 | 1 | +3.4K% | 100% | ISRG+3.4K% |
| 2005 | 6 | +3.4K% | 100% | ISRG+7.9K% |
Lower absolute return than Stock Advisor — because Stock Advisor is two years older and owns the Nvidia lot. Compare the clocks on the same-aged cohorts and the story changes.
The Asymmetric Math:
Winners average +911%. Losers average −38%. That ratio is the product. Sell the winners at +100% and you donate 92.4% of the model’s total gains.
The time table is the honest prospectus:
| Holding Period | Win Rate | Avg Return |
|---|---|---|
| < 1 Year | 46.2% | −4.3% |
| 1–3 Years | 61.3% | +44.8% |
| 5–10 Years | 72.3% | +211.4% |
| 10+ Years | 98.6% | +1,827% |
First-year names start underwater on average. That is not a bug in 2026; it is the design. The 1–3 year window — +44.8% average — is where Rule Breakers often matches or beats Stock Advisor’s same-aged names (+18.2%). If your horizon is truly three years, the disruptor clock is not the stupid one. If you came for the 98.6% decade number, you do not get to skip the first cell.
For the philosophy and the bundle, see our Motley Fool review.
What’s Changed:
David Gardner stepped back from daily picks in May 2021. The team still runs his criteria. The personality is gone. The clock is not.
The Bundle Reality:
No standalone. Epic at $299 (promo) / $499 list, 30-day refund, and you receive Stock Advisor, Hidden Gems, and Dividend Investor whether you wanted them or not. Want the disruptor clock? You are buying the GARP clock anyway.
Best For:
Aggressive capital, $50K+, 10-year hands, who can watch a name sit −80% and still be marked BUY. You want exposure to the thing that is breaking a category — and you understand some of those things stay broken.
Not For:
The 2020–2021 vintage tourist who is still angry. Anyone who will not hold a decade. Anyone who thinks “growth” means “software” on a tape where software is the wipeout.
Try Rule Breakers via Epic Bundle — 30-Day Guarantee
Head-to-Head: The Key Differences
Philosophy: Framework vs. Moonshots
Stock Advisor builds the portfolio. Three risk sleeves, a core list, a score on every name. It is designed to be the primary system — GARP clock, always running.
Rule Breakers hunts the name that should not work on a spreadsheet yet. Many will not. The ones that do are supposed to pay for the graveyard. It is an accelerator. It assumes you already have a foundation.
The Practical Difference: Stock Advisor tells you how to be invested. Rule Breakers tells you what to add when you can afford to be early and wrong.
Track Record: Length vs. Transparency
Stock Advisor: 24.5 years, +981% vs +216%, 66% / 92.9% at a decade, 49 tens, 523 positions. Older. Owns the Nvidia lot. That is why the headline number is larger — time in market, not a secret superiority gene.
Rule Breakers: 21.9 years, +318% vs +187%, 75% overall, 98.6% at a decade, 37 tens, 219 positions. Smaller headline, higher hit rate, and a published time curve that does not flinch at the first-year red.
The Practical Difference: SA’s extra two years and the early mega-winners explain most of the gap. RB’s 1–3 year cohort often matches. For a new subscriber starting today, the clocks are closer than +981 vs +318 looks.
Volatility: Uncomfortable vs. Brutal
Stock Advisor: 30–50% holes. Survivable if you came for a decade.
Rule Breakers: 50%+ as normal. 80–90% as a Tuesday. Trade Desk is on this card at −83% from a 2024 ticket. That is the software wipeout sitting inside the book, not a hypothetical.
The Practical Difference: If a 40% hole ruins your month, you do not have a Rule Breakers problem. You have a you problem — and Stock Advisor is the kinder classroom.
Pricing: Standalone vs. Bundle
Stock Advisor: $99 promo / $199 list, 30-day out, no bundle required.
Rule Breakers: Epic only, $299 promo / $499 list, 30-day out, four scorecards.
The Practical Difference: If you only want one Fool service, there is one answer. If you want Rule Breakers, you already own Stock Advisor. The comparison collapses into “do I need the other two sleeves?”
How to Decide: Stock Advisor vs Rule Breakers
Choose Stock Advisor if:
- You are new to the Fool and want the flagship clock
- You want a complete framework, not a moonshot sleeve
- You want standalone pricing
- 30–50% is your volatility ceiling
- $25K+ and a 5+ year horizon is the honest picture
Choose Rule Breakers (via Epic) if:
- You already run Stock Advisor and want the disruptor satellite
- You can sit through 50%+ holes without turning them into market commentary
- You want all four Fool scorecards and will fund them
- $50K+ and a genuine 10-year clock
- You understand “BUY” can coexist with −80%
Either Works if:
- You will actually hold 5+ years (you are the variable)
- You accept that ~25–35% of picks lose
- This is an input, not a personality
The Tiebreaker:
Do you want a GARP clock or a disruptor clock? Foundation or accelerator? Most people should start the foundation. The software wipeout is the exam for the accelerator — and exams are how you learn whether you can keep the clock running.
The Verdict: Stock Advisor Wins for Most Investors
Stock Advisor is the better choice for most investors. Official +981% vs +216%, 66% becoming 92.9% at a decade, 49 ten-baggers, $99, standalone, a framework you can run as a life. SanDisk +591% against Trade Desk −63% is the exam. The GARP clock is how you own hardware without marrying the software multiple that just failed it.
Rule Breakers is not “growth is back.” Hardware is the boom. Software is the wipeout. This book lives in both rooms. The 1–3 year cohort can still match Stock Advisor. The decade number (98.6%, Tesla +16,224%) was built by buying the thing that felt too early while everyone else waited for a clean chart. Software down 25–60% is historically where that clock finds its next decade — if you will hold the decade. VIX at 14 is not permission. CPI at 3.4% and a 9–3 Fed are the other hand on the scale.
The real question, once you want Rule Breakers, is $99 or $299 — because Epic includes Stock Advisor. New to this? Start with SA. Already know you want the full house? Epic is four clocks for the price of a sloppy three. The worst outcome is buying Rule Breakers for the excitement and selling the first −50% like it was a bug.
If neither clock is yours, start at the best stock advisors guide. Also: Stock Advisor vs Epic for the bundle math, Stock Advisor vs Alpha Picks for a sell-discipline alternative.
Start with Motley Fool Stock Advisor — 30-Day Money-Back Guarantee
Frequently Asked Questions
Stock Advisor vs Rule Breakers: which is better?
Stock Advisor wins for most investors. Longer official book (+981% vs +318%), 66% win becoming 92.9% at 10+ years, 49 ten-baggers across 523 positions, $99 standalone vs $299 Epic, lower volatility. On this tape the GARP clock is the core: hardware boom, software wipeout, same sector label, opposite outcomes. Rule Breakers is the disruptor clock — 75% win, 37 tens, 98.6% at a decade, and a 1–3 year cohort that often matches SA. You only get it inside Epic, which includes Stock Advisor anyway.
Is Motley Fool Stock Advisor worth it?
Yes, for patient growth investors with 5+ year horizons. Official +981% vs +216%, 49 ten-baggers, 173 doublers, 523 positions, 66% / 92.9% at a decade. $99 new-member, 30-day refund. The framework is the product. The picks are how it shows up in the mailbox.
Is Motley Fool Rule Breakers worth it?
Yes, for aggressive capital that will hold 5–10+ years and can fund Epic. Official +318% vs +187%, 75% win, 37 ten-baggers, Tesla +16,224%. First-year names start red. Software wipeout is the current exam, not a reason to skip the class if the clock is truly a decade. No standalone: $299 Epic, 30-day refund, four scorecards.
Can I use both Stock Advisor and Rule Breakers?
Yes — and if you want Rule Breakers, you must. Epic includes Stock Advisor. Many investors run SA as the GARP core and RB as the disruptor satellite. That is the design. Do not run two clocks on the same dollar.
Why is Rule Breakers not available standalone?
The Fool bundled it into Epic with Stock Advisor, Hidden Gems, and Dividend Investor. At $299 promo you are paying roughly $75 per scorecard if you use all four — less than SA standalone. If you will not use the other three, you are paying for a museum.
Which is better in 2026’s market: Stock Advisor or Rule Breakers?
Stock Advisor keeps the core. Rule Breakers is a “which half of tech” decision, not a revival. Memory minted the year (SanDisk +591%). Software donated it (Intuit −48%). GARP can live in the first room. The disruptor clock is being graded in the second. RB’s 98.6% decade number was built by sitting through exactly this kind of humiliation. The gap is about your clock, not a press-release about growth being back.
Can I use both Stock Advisor and Rule Breakers together?
Yes — Epic is the both. $299. SA as the quality foundation (49 tens, +981%, 92.9% at 10+ years). RB as the accelerator (37 tens, +318%, 98.6% at 10+ years). On a tape that split tech in half, that pairing is how you own the hardware compounder and still have a process for the software name you believe in. It is not how you average two theses on the same ticker.
Did David Gardner leave Rule Breakers?
He stepped back from making the picks in May 2021. He is still a Fool. The team runs the criteria. The philosophy — hunt the category-breaker before it is obvious — is intact. The voice in the rec letter is not his. If you were buying a personality, you are late. If you were buying a clock, the clock is still on the wall.

















